Supreme Court to rule on two cases that could reshape access to health care for LGBTQ+ people
The justices are expected to issue rulings on the most controversial cases of the term imminently.
June 11 2025 5:25 PM
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
The justices are expected to issue rulings on the most controversial cases of the term imminently.
“This is just another attempt by extremist Republican politicians to further their anti-transgender agenda,” U.S. Rep. Mark Takano said.
They rallied to bring the 31-year-old makeup artist back from CECOT in El Salvador.
Deporting people this way “surely does not pass muster,” the justices wrote.
Attorneys argue the ban “fails under any level of review,” citing a “shocking proposition that transgender people do not exist.”
It would be “unprecedented and un-American,” lawyers argued.
The Kentucky clerk who denied same-sex couples marriage licenses is trying to get the Supreme Court to overturn marriage equality.
The Department of Justice is asking the court to set aside a lower court’s block on the anti-trans policy.
LGBTQ+ and public health advocates warn that a ruling in favor of the plaintiffs would allow insurers to begin denying or charging for services currently guaranteed to be free—like STI testing, diabetes screening, contraception, and maternal care.
Here's what’s at stake in the latest Obamacare challenge that the original plaintiffs claimed encouraged people to be gay.
Ivan Mendez of the Prince George's County Police Department was convicted for leaking confidential police information.
Just how far does religious freedom go? Many human rights experts believe it's already gone too far.
Unlikely, but not impossible.
The resolution failed to pass the state Senate in a 16-31 vote after only ten minutes of debate.
The practice has been widely condemned as harmful and ineffective.
Justices from both sides of the aisle appeared inclined to side with the straight white woman who claimed she was discriminated against because she was not gay.
Marlean Ames claims that she suffered “reverse discrimination” as a straight white woman when her queer colleagues were promoted over her.
The Advocate spoke with V Spehar and RaeShanda Lias about the latest developments in the saga surrounding the popular app.
The case stems from a Texas company that argued covering PrEP violated its religious freedoms, claiming the medication encourages “homosexual behavior.”
Two conservative justices joined the court’s liberals.